Peace talks seeking judges salary review collapse as court adjourns to June 28 for hearing on originating summons

0
211
NASS drama: Senator embarrasses Sergeant-at-Arm over routine staff redeployment
NASS drama: Senator embarrasses Sergeant-at-Arm over routine staff redeployment

Attempts to settle out of court, a suit instituted against the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and the National Judicial Council (NJC), seeking a general review of wages for the Nigerian Judges, have collapsed.

The court action instituted by a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Chief Sebastine Hon could not be amicably settled as proposed on June 6 by the National Assembly (NASS).

At Wednesday’s proceedings, NASS which proposed the out-of-court settlement said it could not bring the parties together for talks.

Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), who was supposed to be a party to the out-of-court settlement, had filed a counter affidavit and preliminary objection against the suit.

Advertisement

Counsel to AGF, Ekene Elodimuo, confirmed to the National Industrial Court in Abuja that his client (AGF) was desirous of going on with the court hearing of the suit and had filed necessary processes.

The National Judicial Council on its part has also engaged the services of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kunle Adegoke to present its position in the determination of the suit.

At the proceedings, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), who stood for the plaintiff told Justice Osatohanmwen Obaseki-Osaghae that the AGF had served on him his counter affidavit and preliminary objection indicating that the June 6 proposed out-of-court settlement has collapsed.

The senior lawyer asked the court to allow him proceed with hearing of the originating summons of his client.

However, counsel to NJC, Kunle Adegoke (SAN), pleaded with the judge to grant him a short adjournment to enable him file necessary processes in respect of the matter.

He informed the court that the NJC briefed him in less than 24 hours ago and that he needed time to study the originating summons and file his response.

Counsel for the plaintiff (Awomolo) did not oppose the request for adjournment but he however pleaded with the court to allow hearing in the matter on Monday June 27.

In a brief ruling Justice Obaseki-Osaghae granted the adjournment request by the NJC but fixed June 28 for hearing of the suit.

The proceedings were attended by the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Olumide Akpata, Femi Falana (SAN), and not fewer than 30 Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs).

Apart from NASS, AGF, NJC, other defendant in the suit is Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) but was not represented in court by any legal practitioner.

Plaintiff in the suit, Chief Hon, who instituted the case, is praying the court to compel the defendants (AGF, NJC NASS) to increase the salaries and allowances of judges in Nigeria.

In a supporting affidavit to the originating summons, plaintiff stated that as a legal practitioner, “who has practised in all the levels of courts in Nigeria, I know that poor pay for judicial officers is seriously affecting the quality of judgments and rulings those officers are delivering and the discharge of other functions associated with their offices.”

He argued that the current economic reality in the country requires that the salaries and allowances of the nation’s judges be urgently improved upon.

The plaintiff noted that the highest-paid judicial officer in Nigeria – the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) – currently earns about N3.4 million per annum, far below what is earned by such an officer in other countries.

Hon, who quoted what all judicial officers earn as provided under Part IIB of the Schedule to the Certain Political, Public and Judicial Office Holders (Salaries and Allowances, etc) Amendment Act 2008, said the paltry sums had discouraged him from aspiring to become a judge.

At the proceedings of June 6, the National Assembly had asked the court to allow an out-of-court settlement in the suit .

NASS, through its counsel, Mr Charles Yoila, told Justice Obaseki-Osaghae, that the institution was interested in an out-of-court settlement policy because of the nature of the matter.

The counsel pleaded with the court to grant an adjournment so as to enable parties in the matter sit at a round table for discussion of an amicable resolution.

Stay ahead with the latest updates! Join The ConclaveNG on WhatsApp and Telegram for real-time news alerts, breaking stories, and exclusive content delivered straight to your phone. Don’t miss a headline — subscribe now!

Join Our WhatsApp Channel Join Our Telegram Channel

Leave a ReplyCancel reply