A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday dismissed the objection raised by the National Judicial Council (NJC) against the hearing of a suit instituted by a dismissed Judge, Rita Ofili Ajumogobia, to challenge her dismissal.
The NJC had in 2018 dismissed Justice Ajumogobia as a Judge of the Federal High Court from the service of the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) on the ground of alleged gross misconduct.
Not satisfied with the NJC’s action, Justice Ajumogobia instituted an action at the Federal High Court, Abuja, challenging the process adopted by the fact-finding committee of the NJC that led to her dismissal.
The embattled Judge prayed the court to declare as illegal, unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void the report of the fact-finding committee that recommended her dismissal.
Among others, the dismissed Judge claimed that her fundamental right to fair hearing was breached in the way and manner she was dismissed from the court bench.
However, the NJC and other defendants in the matter filed separate preliminary objections against the hearing of the suit on the ground that the Federal High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain such a matter.
The NJC contended that, being a labour-related matter involving an employment, the plaintiff ought to have gone to the National Industrial Court to ventilate her grievances.
The defendants, while denying the claim of the denial of fair hearing by the judge, further contended that the case was statute-barred, having not been instituted within three months as required by the Public Officers Protection Act.
Specifically, as reported by Newsonthego, they claimed that Section 2 of the Public Officers Protection Act “makes it mandatory for such a matter to be instituted within three months for the matter to be competent.”
Justice Ajumogobia in her counter affidavit had prayed Justice Inyang Ekwo to dismiss the objection to her suit on the ground that she was challenging the constitutionality of her dismissal.
In his ruling, Justice Ekwo dismissed all the objections pon the ground that they were misplaced and that the claim of the plaintiff was misconstrued.
The Judge held that Justice Ajumogobia raised constitutional issues bordering on denial of fair hearing in the manner she was dismissed.
Justice Ekwo further held that the case of the plaintiff did not fall under the provision of the Public Officers Protection Act as claimed by the NJC and as such, was not statute barred.
The judge therefore held that the plaintiff’s claim, being a constitutional matter, could only be heard by a Federal High Court and not a National Industrial Court as canvassed by the NJC.
The Judge therefore fixed April 5, 6 and 7 for hearing of the substantive matter.
Other defendants in the matter are the Attorney General of the Federation, President Muhammadu Buhari, Justice Olufemi Akintan, Justice Ishaq Bello and Justice Julieth Kentu. (Newsonthego)
Stay ahead with the latest updates! Join The ConclaveNG on WhatsApp and Telegram for real-time news alerts, breaking stories, and exclusive content delivered straight to your phone. Don’t miss a headline — subscribe now!
